|
Understand Third Party
Logistics 
We are in the early stage of the new logistics paradigm. How it
all comes together with supply chain management and with 3rd-parties
is still formative.. The growth and driving forces may be different
from what we see now and perceive will happen.
FUTURE
GROWTH. The third-party logistics market will explode--big
time. Users and providers will not be able to keep up with it.
There is precedence for this view. Look at what happened with
manufacturing. Not long ago firms did most of their own manufacturing.
Then they outsourced some components, tooling and other odd items
and work. Then it exploded. Now look at it. Look at the amount
of finished goods and other items we import from throughout the
world. The same thing may happen with logistics. And logistics
departments will not be able to stop it from happening and may
not even be able to control it.
SCHISM
IN PROVIDERS. The present emphasis seems to be on asset-based
providers. Another type of provider may emerge--the logistics
service provider. Many asset-based third-parties are part of an
organization which also has transportation, warehousing, freight
forwarding or other capabilities. This organizational situation
may put the third-party at odds with truly meeting the needs of
the client. Can he truly develop a tailored logistics solution
which does not involve using the capabilities of the parent company?
Can he serve two masters--the parent and the customer?
Against this situation, a new type of third-party
will emerge. The new providers will design, develop and manage
customer-specific, tailored solutions. These logistics service
providers will not be part of a transport, warehouse, freight
forwarding or other company. Logistics Service Providers will
work specifically on customized logistics services.
Now which approach will take the larger piece
of the action? Given the present status, the asset-based firm
has the big jump in the market. But will they lose ground in the
future to Logistics Service Providers? Another issue which may
impact this schism is the growing emphasis and needs of international
logistics. Many present third-parties have a strength, based on
their parent, which is domestic or international in thrust. They
are a good transport or warehouse firm, but domestically. Yes,
they can develop alliances with international providers. But that
still leaves a weakness in their experience, expertise and ability
to design tailored solutions. Can they really develop and manage
the solution if they do not understand the various global pieces
and how they fit together?
It is the same situation for the international
freight forwarder. He knows international air freight or whatever.
He may understand various export and import regulations and requirements.
But he does not really understand LTL in the U.S. Or warehousing.
So how will the pieces fit together? The answer is--with great
difficulty.
Hence the emergence of the Logistics Service
Provider who is not asset-based and is more experience in the
total logistics pipeline. Very possibly the drivers of Logistics
Service Providers may come from the shipper side, which has broader
domestic and international experience. They may drive the outsource
decision for their own company and operate the service as an outside
company. Or shippers may become the key executives in third-parties,
because they have the required knowledge and experience of the
international and domestic logistics.
GROWTH
WITH INTERNATIONAL. There is a huge market opportunity for
global contract logistics providers. I believe this future is
much larger and important than what is happening now, which is
mostly in domestic areas. Look at international trade. Imports
from Asia. Exports to Europe. And everything else. This is what
is happening to businesses. Therefore, it must happen with third-party
logistics. In addition, the implications of such providers to
the present steamship line and air freight carriers may be significant.
Third-parties are not held in high regard by some steamship lines.
Global contract logistics providers may force some major changes
in the sales approach for ocean carriers. Steamship lines may
end up like the railroads with intermodal. They may have to decide
whether carriers wholesale or retail their services. How this
focus is resolved may dramatically change steamship lines.
GROWTH
WITH MEDIUM AND SMALL SHIPPERS. Most of the implementation
now is with major corporations. Big firms working with big providers.
This is a natural attraction. But there is a significant market
opportunity to develop third-party services for medium and small
firms. However I do not believe that the present major third-parties
will be the ones to exploit this opportunity.
Look at how many carriers now handle the smaller
firms. They do not have sales persons call on such accounts. Instead
they telemarket them. And some third-parties will not bid on business
which does not meet certain revenue thresholds--which smaller
firms are not likely to have. This leaves a significant, untapped
market opportunity.
In the Philadelphia area, the Greater Philadelphia
Chamber of Commerce has 6000 members, 85% of which are firms of
100 employees or less. This is a significant statistic. And it
is not atypical. Corporate downsizing and other events have created
new opportunities which small firms are taking advantage of. These
same small firms have logistics needs. They read articles about
outsourcing logistics. There is the potential--for a new provider.
CONCLUSION.
So what does all this mean? There will be be very significant
growth, opportunities and changes for third-party logistics. Three
new types of providers will develop. There will be Logistics Service
Providers (in addition to asset-based providers). There will be
Global Contract Logistics Providers. And there will be Providers
for Medium-Small businesses (these will not the same as the present
major providers).
|